In case you were wondering: the sex part of polyamory, that's the easy part - it is re-learning the social norms and managing your thinking that gets complicated. In fact, so far this whole polyamory thing has involved far more talking and thinking than actually fucking. (I know, bummer.)
To be honest the talking part is actually great - fucking other people has made for an astounding leap in the way the Husband and I process our feelings and deal with each other. It has made us express vulnerability and talk it out, which has also meant confirming our commitment to one another out loud. This can't be a bad thing in the grand scheme of things.
The thinking is harder. Harder in that we keep tripping over old paradigms that I am trying desperately to banish from my head and our relationship. The Expert Guide wisely identifies one of the key problems for those in a polyamourous situation as being the "what, am I not special?" issue. From the perspective of the primary partner this means: why do you need or want to see them? Am I not enough? Or, from the perspective of the non-primary partner it manifests as: because you need to see someone other than your spouse, shouldn't you like me just a little bit more than them?
At first glance these appear to be a good questions - but the underlying assumptions are flawed. The questions presuppose that the one relationship is caused by a flaw in the other partner or that there is a contest between relationships - but you know what? It isn't about them and it isn't a contest.
When I returned from visiting the Expert Guide recently, the Husband said "how many times did you fuck him?" And - stupidly - I answered without taking his emotional temperature, figuring that he was asking because he was curious.
I figured wrong, we were having a specialness competition.
This was evident in his somewhat bitter and uncomfortable response: "he has fucked you more times this year than I have." OK, well, if we are going to bean count - for the sake of clarity we are talking about individual sex acts and not about encounters - I have seen the Expert Guide three times this calender year - I just fuck him lots when I see him. So, more? I dunno about that. (And yes, I just said "sex act" - and no, it's not a road show - you can't buy tickets. Yet.)
I admit part of the Husband's issue here is that some dude puts his cock in his wife - and apparently he does it lots and lots and over and over again. Even I have a vague understanding that this is an issue all on its own. However, I also think part of his concern arises from the fact that he is defining my relationship with him in competition to my relationship to the Boyfriend - there is only so much Errant Wife to go around, after all - so, how many times did I get in there...did I do it most, am I the winner of the pussy contest?
This is not a thought-process that is unique to the Husband. We all tend to define our romantic or sexual relationships in opposition - in a culture where one sexual partner is the norm, it is hard to conceptualize that two or more relationships can peacefully co-exist. The difficulty is how to convey that my relationship with the Expert Guide does not lessen my relationship with the Husband. To me it makes sense - after all, my relationship with my family, my friends, my colleagues - those do not detract from my relationship with the Husband - they do not make my husband less special. The difference is that none of them get me off - but really, how big a deal is that?
My husband remains unconvinced that it is not a big deal.
We are talking it out.
Honesty time? I am the queen of theoretical polyamory - generous to a fault about being shared, generous to a fault about sharing the men in my life with miscellaneous sluts of their choosing. I am smugly progressive in my poly thinking. I identify this specialness pothole when it comes to my relationship with the Husband and I can usually conceptualize it very well in discussions with the Expert Guide about the Husband. But, I do get a little stuck sometimes when thinking about the Expert Guide's wife.
Ah yes, Mrs. Boyfriend. Usually I understand and respect my role and my relationship to the Expert Guide within the context of his primary relationship. I take a secondary seat to the woman with whom he shares his life, as I should. It doesn't bother me that he is married and I do not seek to replace his wife in his heart or in his life. It isn't a contest and I don't need to be more than her, to unseat her, in order to be comfortable with my relationship with him.
However, this weekend the unusually distant Expert Guide emailed me and made a comment about "living the dream" of an open and polyamorous relationship with his wife and how it involved a lot of negotiation and how he had to tread carefully around the issue of his blonde slut, lest all be lost.
Oooh, well that tickled oddly. It surprised me that I didn't like the way it felt. I felt...uncomfortable? jealous?...less special?...like I had lost? I had my own little specialness competition, right there by myself. Particularly ironic in this instance because the words he used were the exact same words I have used to discuss my husband with him. (I have never claimed to not be a hypocrite.)
So I took a moment to reflect, realizing that my discomfort was not a rational reaction. Many would call it instinctive, but I disagree on that - I think we confuse a response that is culturally created with a response that is instinctive because the culture is so ingrained that they feel the same - it still comes from the gut, the difference is what put it there.
I gave it some thought and you know what? News flash: his relationship with his wife is not about me, not even a little. That response on my part was caused by jealousy and a culture that tells me that I need to be more special than his wife if I want to matter - either way, it is a paradigm I am working hard to reject.
I am thinking it out.
As I said, the sex part is easy, it is the rest that is complicated.
Sinful Sunday – Ride ‘Em
1 hour ago





